To view the Resolution please Click Here.
View:-It
is not humanly possible to balance everything at the same time. We should think
forward and try to imagine what we will regret later. We must know what is
important to us and plan accordingly. Dear Friends, we must set or reset our
priorities right.
1 comment:
Dear CS Sir,
The reply of the APMG(Vig) is not at all proper and convincing. It is very antagonistic to our resolution dated 24.02.2014. By giving the above reply, the Administration has made their intention very clear that they will punish the poor IP/ASP by hook or by crook to recover the loss without going through the circumstances or merit of the case. In this context, I want to bring it to the kind notice that if a single man like IP/ASP in charge of sub division having no assistance except one OS Mails is determined as offender for not properly investigating the case, then why not the officers who are heading CLI/DLI with assistance of many IPs/ASPs and other senior officers will not be declared as offenders for their lacuna/lapses of non-identification of the subsidiary offender during such higher level investigation like CLI/DLI. Why the CLI/DLI is being delayed by the higher officers? In case of loss/fraud case with involvement of huge amount, the CLI/DLI should be conducted at once on receipt of the preliminary report without awaiting the detailed report of the IP/ASP for years together to enlighten each aspect of the case in a effective manner.
So, I would like to request my dear CS to raise objection over the reply of the APMG (Vig)and protest the administration strongly on this matter.
With Regards,
Y.F.
Member, AIAIPASP, Odisha Circle.
Post a Comment