No. AIAIPASP/Corr-1/17/2015
24/11/2015
To
Shri Tilak De, IPoS
Chief
Postmaster General
Odisha Circle, Bhubaneswar-751001
Sub:- Disproportionate quantum of Punishment and
imposition of Penalty of Recovery on IPs/ASPs as subsidiary offender -regarding.
Respected
Sir,
This
is in continuation of this Association Circle Working Committee Resolution
dated 22-02-2015 which was communicated vide Association Letter No. AIAIPASP/Corr-1/03/2015
dated 24-02-2015.
The Circle Working
Committee of this Association met at PRC, Bhubaneswar GPO on 15/11/2015 as per
the notification No. AIAIPASP/CWC-3/2015 dated
20/10/2015. In this CWC meeting each and every single member expressed their anguish
over
the trend of exercising the Disciplinary authority on IPs/ASPs in a tyrannical way. Although the quantum of penalty
is within the domain of the discretion of the Disciplinary Authority, selective
treatment to IPs/ASPs by imposing of heavy penalty of
recovery even in Lakhs as subsidiary offender, in the cases where the pecuniary
loss has been caused by the Principal Offender and the same is not attributable
to the concerned IP/ASP,
is arbitrary, whimsical and oppressive. This Association strongly believes that
due weightage to the extenuating circumstances in which the IPs/ASPs are
performing their duty is not being taken into consideration while arriving at
the quantum of Punishment. This is adversely affecting the moral of the concerned
IPs/ASPs and has sent a wrong message to the entire Inspectorial cadre across the Circle. The
right to impose a penalty carries with it the duty to act justly.
The Circle Working
Committee desires to express its concern on following issues:-
a) i. It is not exaggerated
to say that the IPs/ASPs are playing a pivotal role to achieve the goal
outlined for the development of the Department. For this they undertake
tremendous pressure to achieve the target in SB, PLI, RPLI, BD etc. The last
mile of IT Modernization Project rests on the shoulders of IPs/ASPs. The
successful implementation of financial inclusion of peripheral India through
stabilization of MNREAGA is an indication to the level of commitment by the
IPs/ASPs.
ii. It is no denying fact
that to discharge the above multifarious responsibilities in addition to normal
traditional works like inspection of Post Office work, investigation of loss
& Fraud cases, Review of Establishment etc. will have crunching effect on
the available time which is un-stretchable by nature.
iii. The natural
corollary is that IPs/ASPs are incredibly stressed on time front to accomplice
the job in a time bound manner. Therefore it is obvious that in crowding
environment there may be some un-intentional lapses creep in while discharging variety
of tasks at one time
despite all precaution and good intention.
iv. The Association
however noted with dismay that in recent days our members have been victimized
for these un-intentional minor lapses disproportionately by way of imposition
of penalty of heavy recoveries by remotely connecting the lapses with
figment of imagination and hypothetical deduction.
v. Under this highly
insecure environment, the IPs/ASPs have only recourse to adopt safety as
first policy to concentrate on inspection of Post Office Work, timely
submission of IRs, completion of investigation to loss & Fraud cases,
Review of IRs etc. at the cost of business activities. All of us will agree
that this will obviously lead to dip in productivity of business procurement.
b) At
times the IPs and ASPs burdened with discharging
the duties of more than one post to complete their pending inspection work
in a hurry even complete more than one office in a day. While working in a
hurry one is bound to overlook minor things. Therefore, the posts of IPs/ASPs should not be kept vacant taking into
consideration the functional necessity. The vacant posts of ASPs which can be be filled up by regular appointment need
to be filled up as and when the vacancy arises and the vacancy arising due to
officiating of ASPs in PS Group-B Cadre need to be filled up by ad-hoc
appointment. System of making one officer discharge the duties of more than
one post should not be resorted to for long periods as it is not conducive to
efficiency. Presently there are some vacant posts of IPs and ASPs in the
Circle for which regular appointment and officiating arrangement
required to be made immediately. Similarly the vacant IP Posts need to be
filled up on ad-hoc basis until the regular candidates become available. If the
eligible PAs/SAs are not coming forward to officiate in vacant IP Posts, then
the Circle Administration needs to analyze why they are not interested. This Association
believes that it is the variety of tasks and relevant circumstances under which
the IPs are performing their duties is preventing them to come forward.
c)
With
the increase in number of Questionnaire the pressure on IPs/ASPs has been
increasing over the years.
Further the number of days for inspection of Post Office work is not being
rationalized with the increase in number of Questionnaire. This is also
affecting the efficient functioning of IPs/ASPs at times.
d) It has been a matter of
concern with many believing that the Circle Administration is targeting
specific individuals at the time of their Promotion and Retirement by
categorizing them as subsidiary offender in past cases relating to 5/10/15
years back.
e) It is also a matter of
concern that no action is being taken for implementation of the Public
Accountants’ Default (PAD) Act for recovery of the pecuniary loss to the
Government caused by the Principal offender for better avoidance of the loss.
Is it not encouraging for commission of more loss and fraud cases? It is
well-read that the present Circle Administration has a very good relationship
with the State Govt. authorities and, therefore, there is a scope for the
Circle Administration to utilize this opportunity to help the Divisional
Administration in implementation of the PAD Act in loss and fraud cases.
I, on behalf of this
Association would like to request you to take into consideration the variety
of tasks performed by IPs/ASPs at one time and the
relevant circumstances as narrated above into the decision making process
while awarding the punishment. Further, the CWC met on 15-11-2015 urges the
Administration to exercise the power of Disciplinary Authority fairly,
justly and reasonably. The CWC also expresses its desire to discuss
all the issues with the Chief PMG for which a convenient time may kindly be
allowed.
With deep regards,
Yours sincerely,
(Pitabasa Jena)
Circle Secretary
Copy
for kind information to:-
1. The
PMsG, Berhampur and Sambalpur Region.
2. The
DPS(HQ), Bhubaneswar HQ Region, Bhubaneswar-751001.
3. All
the Divisional Heads (Postal/RMS) of Odisha Circle.
Circle Secretary
3 comments:
A good step.Why the 5/10 years slept cases suddenly upsurge before promotion? Can't they sleep one/two month more ? When there is no ready Disc/vig. case in hand against an Officer, how far it is correct to delay issuance of clearance certificate until a case is formulated against him.
Nice representation. Most of the times the principal offenders are set free.Implementation of P A D Act needs to be ensured.
A praiseworthy move. Subsidiary has no definite definition. It is nothing but scapegoat theory and ridiculus. The Disciplinary Authority making mockery of justice.
This should be scraped instantly from the volume as well as from the mind.
P.K.Das
Post a Comment