The charter of demands drafted by CHQ of AIAIASP for the proposed strike is reproduced below for comments by members. Anonymous comments will not be published.
i. Up-gradation of Grade Pay of Inspector, Posts from Rs. 4200/- to Rs. 4600/- and merger of post of Assistant Superintendent, Posts with the post of PS Group “B” as both are having Gazetted status and difference in Grade Pay is only Rs. 200/-
ii. There are 866 posts in PS Group “B” cadre. At present 75% posts i.e., 649 are filled through DPC on the basis of seniority cum fitness. 19% posts i.e., 165 are filled through LDCE among IP line officials and 6% i.e., 52 are filled through LDCE among General Line officials. Consequent upon the introduction of Postmaster cadre, there should be no change in 75% posts i.e., 649 posts through seniority quota. 87 posts of Senior Postmaster to be filled up through LDCE of IP line officials should be adjusted in 165 posts of existing examination quota of PS Group “B”.
iii. Consequent upon the introduction of Postmaster cadre, suitable amendment may be made in Recruitment Rules of PS Group “B” cadre revising quota of General Line from 6% to 3%.
iv. Implementation of the recommendations of Second CRC and restructuring of Inspector, Posts cadre as an Inspector is getting promotion in P.S. Group “B” only after 24 to 26 years of service in Inspector, Posts cadre.
v. Revision of rates of remuneration for performing duty as Invigilators in the examinations.
vi. Supply of Laptops to all IPs/ASPs.
vii. Promotion earned through examination should be not be counted while granting MACP.
viii. 141 HSG I IP line posts may be re-designated as Assistant Superintendent Posts as it is a promotional for Inspector, Posts.
ix. Holding of periodical meetings with the Association at regular intervals. No periodical meeting has been held since long time despite submission of agenda for the same.
ii. There are 866 posts in PS Group “B” cadre. At present 75% posts i.e., 649 are filled through DPC on the basis of seniority cum fitness. 19% posts i.e., 165 are filled through LDCE among IP line officials and 6% i.e., 52 are filled through LDCE among General Line officials. Consequent upon the introduction of Postmaster cadre, there should be no change in 75% posts i.e., 649 posts through seniority quota. 87 posts of Senior Postmaster to be filled up through LDCE of IP line officials should be adjusted in 165 posts of existing examination quota of PS Group “B”.
iii. Consequent upon the introduction of Postmaster cadre, suitable amendment may be made in Recruitment Rules of PS Group “B” cadre revising quota of General Line from 6% to 3%.
iv. Implementation of the recommendations of Second CRC and restructuring of Inspector, Posts cadre as an Inspector is getting promotion in P.S. Group “B” only after 24 to 26 years of service in Inspector, Posts cadre.
v. Revision of rates of remuneration for performing duty as Invigilators in the examinations.
vi. Supply of Laptops to all IPs/ASPs.
vii. Promotion earned through examination should be not be counted while granting MACP.
viii. 141 HSG I IP line posts may be re-designated as Assistant Superintendent Posts as it is a promotional for Inspector, Posts.
ix. Holding of periodical meetings with the Association at regular intervals. No periodical meeting has been held since long time despite submission of agenda for the same.
1 comment:
Sir,
The 2nd para of the charter is not at all necessary. It needs to be reanylysed as under :-
(i) Firstly 116 posts carved out for Sr PM post is not all correct as the quoto of Genl line official in the erstwhile group B combined post of 866 is only 52. Then how should the dept earmark 116 posts for Sr PM cadre?
(ii) Secondly if the 116 post for Sr PM cadre is correctly earmarked, then the remaining (116-52=64) 64 posts meant for IP line officials should be equally distributed amongst Promotion on seniorty (75%) and LCDE(19%) in the same percentage by earmarking 48 posts to those IP line officials selected on seniority and remaining 16 posts only to be LCDE for IP line officials.
(iii) Now go to our charter of demand( para 2)and think about the justification of the demand for no reduction of 649 posts earmarked for seniority quoto of IP line officials which is nothing but entirely agianst the interest of young IP/ASP of our association. The association should think abt this and take action accordingly.
Post a Comment